Accessibility testing and consultancy
We combine automated checks, manual testing and critical user journeys. Your team receives reviewed findings, practical remediation guidance and retest evidence.
Services
Establish a defensible baseline, move reviewed findings through remediation, or keep accessibility evidence current across releases.
Find the barriers affecting a defined service, product or release, then give your team reviewed evidence it can act on.
A prioritised baseline for delivery and governance decisions.
Scope an accessibility audit Service detailsTurn reviewed findings into clear fix decisions, then verify changes against the original evidence.
A defensible record of what is fixed, unresolved or regressed.
Plan remediation support Service detailsBuild scheduled testing, journey coverage and human review into an active delivery cycle.
Comparable evidence that keeps accessibility visible between releases.
Set an assurance cadence Service detailsWhat we test
Coverage is agreed during scoping and recorded against the page, journey, viewport and evidence that produced each finding.
Repeatable rule checks flag potential barriers across the pages and states in scope.
Focus order, operability, visible focus and interaction states are tested manually.
Agreed paths are exercised from entry to completion, including error and recovery states.
Findings record the viewport and environment in which each barrier was observed.
User impact, standards mapping and remediation guidance are checked before handoff.
Fixes are checked under the original test conditions, with the outcome recorded.
Sample finding
This example shows report structure only. It is not a client result or a conformance determination.
After opening the service dialog, pressing Tab moves focus to page navigation behind the modal before the dialog controls are completed.
How an engagement works
Six connected stages keep assumptions, evidence, ownership and retest visible.
Agree the assessment goal, targets, journeys, environments and authorisation.
Confirm access, accounts, test data, dependencies and exclusions.
Run automated discovery, manual procedures and critical journeys.
Check the evidence, user impact, standards mapping and any uncertainty.
Give delivery teams prioritised findings and remediation guidance.
Recreate the original conditions and record whether the barrier remains.
Guidance
Short, practical guidance for delivery, design and assurance teams.
Use automation for repeatable discovery, then add manual procedures and journey testing where rules cannot judge context or usability.
Read: What automated accessibility testing can—and cannot—findStart with the decisions the audit must support, then define representative pages, critical journeys, environments and evidence needs.
Read: How to plan a useful accessibility audit scopeIndividual pages can pass isolated checks while a person still cannot complete the task that brought them to the service.
Read: Why critical journeys belong in accessibility testingFrequently asked questions
Questions about scope, timing and the right engagement for your team.
We agree the authorised targets, priority journeys, environments, test accounts, constraints, evidence requirements and activities that are out of scope.
How automated checks, manual procedures and journey testing work together.
No. Automated checks help with repeatable discovery. Manual procedures, journey testing and human review are required to interpret impact and cover behaviour automation cannot determine reliably.
What your team receives and how to interpret the recorded evidence.
The agreed handoff can include an HTML report, structured spreadsheet, evidence-linked findings, remediation direction, a stakeholder readout and retest status. Report accessibility is reviewed against the agreed delivery requirements.
Plan the next step
